Discussion:
Former White House Doctor Warns U.S. Will “Pay A Price” For Electing Cognitively Declining Biden
(too old to reply)
Bob
2021-07-08 11:05:31 UTC
Permalink
Texas Congressman and former White House doctor Ronny Jackson warned this week that the U.S. is going to “pay a price” for having a president that is clearly not able to execute his duties
because of cognitive decline.

Appearing on Hannity, Jackson noted that “Our adversaries are taking advantage of us,” and Biden should be made to take a cognitive test, just as President Trump was.


https://www.infowars.com/posts/video-former-white-house-doctor-warns-u-s-will-pay-a-price-for-electing-cognitively-declining-biden/


*********** This space reserved for poster_4's Sandy Hook rant **************
VanguardLH
2021-07-08 15:55:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob
Texas Congressman and former White House doctor Ronny Jackson warned this week that the U.S. is going to “pay a price” for having a president that is clearly not able to execute his duties
because of cognitive decline.
Appearing on Hannity, Jackson noted that “Our adversaries are taking advantage of us,” and Biden should be made to take a cognitive test, just as President Trump was.
https://www.infowars.com/posts/video-former-white-house-doctor-warns-u-s-will-pay-a-price-for-electing-cognitively-declining-biden/
*********** This space reserved for poster_4's Sandy Hook rant **************
Off-topic, policitical flaming, so spam from a troll wanting to
proselytize his opinion.
Adam H. Kerman
2021-07-08 18:08:20 UTC
Permalink
VanguardLH <***@invalid.invalid> wrote:

[quote of off-topic article deleted]
Post by VanguardLH
Off-topic, policitical flaming, so spam from a troll wanting to
proselytize his opinion.
What the hell did you quote it in full for given that you recognized it
for what it was?
VanguardLH
2021-07-09 01:12:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam H. Kerman
[quote of off-topic article deleted]
Post by VanguardLH
Off-topic, policitical flaming, so spam from a troll wanting to
proselytize his opinion.
What the hell did you quote it in full for given that you recognized it
for what it was?
I don't rely solely on the Subject header to fully detail the content of
the spam post. By the time I trimmed the body to:

Texas Congressman and former White House doctor Ronny Jackson ...
https://www.infowars.com/posts/video-former-white-house-doctor-warns-u-s-will-pay-a-price-for-electing-cognitively-declining-biden/

then there wasn't much that actually got trimmed out, and my reply would
be out of context.
Bizarro Roy
2021-07-09 02:01:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by VanguardLH
Post by Adam H. Kerman
[quote of off-topic article deleted]
Post by VanguardLH
Off-topic, policitical flaming, so spam from a troll wanting to
proselytize his opinion.
What the hell did you quote it in full for given that you recognized it
for what it was?
I don't rely solely on the Subject header to fully detail the content of
Texas Congressman and former White House doctor Ronny Jackson ...
<snipped link>
Post by VanguardLH
then there wasn't much that actually got trimmed out, and my reply would
be out of context.
And you *again* reposted the link. Amazing.

Reposting spam strongly suggests you're the spammer under another nym.
Adam H. Kerman
2021-07-09 11:27:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by VanguardLH
Post by Adam H. Kerman
[quote of off-topic article deleted]
Post by VanguardLH
Off-topic, policitical flaming, so spam from a troll wanting to
proselytize his opinion.
What the hell did you quote it in full for given that you recognized it
for what it was?
I don't rely solely on the Subject header to fully detail the content of
[shilled URL deleted]
What the fuck is wrong with you? Even though you insist on flaming the
troll, DO NOT quote the shilled URL. That makes YOU a contributor to the
problem.
Post by VanguardLH
then there wasn't much that actually got trimmed out, and my reply would
be out of context.
You don't need to provide context as you weren't actually engaging the
troll in a discussion about the topic he wanted discussed.

All the rest of us can recognize off topic for ourselves. Labeling isn't
required. Does it not occur to you that the troll's article might have
been caught in someone's kill file, so by quoting even a portion of it,
you deliberately deleted his filtering?
Bizarro Roy
2021-07-09 13:32:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by VanguardLH
Post by Adam H. Kerman
[quote of off-topic article deleted]
Post by VanguardLH
Off-topic, policitical flaming, so spam from a troll wanting to
proselytize his opinion.
What the hell did you quote it in full for given that you recognized it
for what it was?
I don't rely solely on the Subject header to fully detail the content of
[shilled URL deleted]
What the fuck is wrong with you? Even though you insist on flaming the
troll, DO NOT quote the shilled URL. That makes YOU a contributor to the
problem.
Post by VanguardLH
then there wasn't much that actually got trimmed out, and my reply would
be out of context.
You don't need to provide context as you weren't actually engaging the
troll in a discussion about the topic he wanted discussed.
All the rest of us can recognize off topic for ourselves. Labeling isn't
required. Does it not occur to you that the troll's article might have
been caught in someone's kill file, so by quoting even a portion of it,
you deliberately deleted his filtering?
I only saw it when Vanguard reposted it. He can stop "helping" any
time now.
VanguardLH
2021-07-10 02:38:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by VanguardLH
Post by Adam H. Kerman
[quote of off-topic article deleted]
Post by VanguardLH
Off-topic, policitical flaming, so spam from a troll wanting to
proselytize his opinion.
What the hell did you quote it in full for given that you recognized it
for what it was?
I don't rely solely on the Subject header to fully detail the content of
[shilled URL deleted]
What the fuck is wrong with you? Even though you insist on flaming the
troll, DO NOT quote the shilled URL. That makes YOU a contributor to the
problem.
Post by VanguardLH
then there wasn't much that actually got trimmed out, and my reply would
be out of context.
You don't need to provide context as you weren't actually engaging the
troll in a discussion about the topic he wanted discussed.
All the rest of us can recognize off topic for ourselves. Labeling isn't
required. Does it not occur to you that the troll's article might have
been caught in someone's kill file, so by quoting even a portion of it,
you deliberately deleted his filtering?
Someone says "fuck", but, no, I'm supposed to account for your
sensibilities by saying they said "fark". Nope.
Adam H. Kerman
2021-07-10 18:15:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by VanguardLH
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by VanguardLH
Post by Adam H. Kerman
[quote of off-topic article deleted]
Post by VanguardLH
Off-topic, policitical flaming, so spam from a troll wanting to
proselytize his opinion.
What the hell did you quote it in full for given that you recognized it
for what it was?
I don't rely solely on the Subject header to fully detail the content of
[shilled URL deleted]
What the fuck is wrong with you? Even though you insist on flaming the
troll, DO NOT quote the shilled URL. That makes YOU a contributor to the
problem.
Post by VanguardLH
then there wasn't much that actually got trimmed out, and my reply would
be out of context.
You don't need to provide context as you weren't actually engaging the
troll in a discussion about the topic he wanted discussed.
All the rest of us can recognize off topic for ourselves. Labeling isn't
required. Does it not occur to you that the troll's article might have
been caught in someone's kill file, so by quoting even a portion of it,
you deliberately deleted his filtering?
Someone says "fuck", but, no, I'm supposed to account for your
sensibilities by saying they said "fark". Nope.
You wrote a followup that's irrelevant to anything I had written.

The behavior of yours that several of us objected to in this thread was
that you not only quoted the shilled URL, you restored the shilled URL
in your own followup. You personally shilled that URL, yet in your
superior manner, admonished the author of the root article for having
done so. That author isn't even reading this newsgroup to begin with.

You know it was the wrong thing to do but you did it anyway.
Bizarro Roy
2021-07-10 20:21:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by VanguardLH
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by VanguardLH
Post by Adam H. Kerman
[quote of off-topic article deleted]
Post by VanguardLH
Off-topic, policitical flaming, so spam from a troll wanting to
proselytize his opinion.
What the hell did you quote it in full for given that you recognized it
for what it was?
I don't rely solely on the Subject header to fully detail the content of
[shilled URL deleted]
What the fuck is wrong with you? Even though you insist on flaming the
troll, DO NOT quote the shilled URL. That makes YOU a contributor to the
problem.
Post by VanguardLH
then there wasn't much that actually got trimmed out, and my reply would
be out of context.
You don't need to provide context as you weren't actually engaging the
troll in a discussion about the topic he wanted discussed.
All the rest of us can recognize off topic for ourselves. Labeling isn't
required. Does it not occur to you that the troll's article might have
been caught in someone's kill file, so by quoting even a portion of it,
you deliberately deleted his filtering?
Someone says "fuck", but, no, I'm supposed to account for your
sensibilities by saying they said "fark". Nope.
You wrote a followup that's irrelevant to anything I had written.
The behavior of yours that several of us objected to in this thread was
that you not only quoted the shilled URL, you restored the shilled URL
in your own followup. You personally shilled that URL, yet in your
superior manner, admonished the author of the root article for having
done so. That author isn't even reading this newsgroup to begin with.
You know it was the wrong thing to do but you did it anyway.
Yes, he did. I didn't see the original post because it was autokilled
for me, but I saw Vanguard's repost. Since he's insisting he's not
going to change his habits, I've killfiled him.

There was no reason or need for Vanguard to reply to the OT post at all.
Nathan
2021-07-13 00:06:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam H. Kerman
You wrote a followup that's irrelevant to anything I had written.
The behavior of yours that several of us objected to in this thread was
that you not only quoted the shilled URL, you restored the shilled URL
in your own followup. You personally shilled that URL, yet in your
superior manner, admonished the author of the root article for having
done so. That author isn't even reading this newsgroup to begin with.
You know it was the wrong thing to do but you did it anyway.
Grow up!
Some ass-clown posted a political message and you've made an even bigger mess by changing the Subject header and responding to it 3 times. Id10t!
404
2021-07-10 12:49:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam H. Kerman
What the fuck is wrong with you? Even though you insist on flaming the
troll, DO NOT quote the shilled URL. That makes YOU a contributor to the
problem.
Yes, alt.online-service.comcast needs a fact-checker to censor it.

Google Scrubs Mike Cernovich Report on SPLC Link to Mass Shooter from Search Results

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2021/07/09/google-scrubs-mike-cernovich-report-on-splc-link-to-mass-shooter-from-search-results/
MikeJ
2021-07-14 18:02:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by VanguardLH
Post by Adam H. Kerman
[quote of off-topic article deleted]
Post by VanguardLH
Off-topic, policitical flaming, so spam from a troll wanting to
proselytize his opinion.
What the hell did you quote it in full for given that you recognized it
for what it was?
I don't rely solely on the Subject header to fully detail the content of
Texas Congressman and former White House doctor Ronny Jackson ...
https://www.infowars.com/posts/video-former-white-house-doctor-warns-u-
s-will-pay-a-price-for-electing-cognitively-declining-biden/
Post by VanguardLH
then there wasn't much that actually got trimmed out, and my reply would
be out of context.
No, you replied to a troll.You're smarter than that, but you couldn't
resist.What's happened to you?You used to be helpful but annoying, now
you're just an angry old man.

Bizarro Roy
2021-07-08 19:30:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by VanguardLH
Post by Bob
Texas Congressman and former White House doctor Ronny Jackson warned this
week that the U.S. is going to ¥pay a price° for having a president that is
clearly not able to execute his duties
because of cognitive decline.
Appearing on Hannity, Jackson noted that ¥Our adversaries are taking
advantage of us,° and Biden should be made to take a cognitive test, just
as President Trump was.
<snip>
Post by VanguardLH
Post by Bob
*********** This space reserved for poster_4's Sandy Hook rant **************
Off-topic, policitical flaming, so spam from a troll wanting to
proselytize his opinion.
Yes, but you yourself spammed the ng by reposting the link he provided.

Try not to do that again. Thanks.
Frank
2021-07-09 14:28:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bizarro Roy
Post by VanguardLH
Post by Bob
Texas Congressman and former White House doctor Ronny Jackson warned this
week that the U.S. is going to ¥pay a price° for having a president that is
clearly not able to execute his duties
because of cognitive decline.
Appearing on Hannity, Jackson noted that ¥Our adversaries are taking
advantage of us,° and Biden should be made to take a cognitive test, just
as President Trump was.
<snip>
Post by VanguardLH
Post by Bob
*********** This space reserved for poster_4's Sandy Hook rant **************
Off-topic, policitical flaming, so spam from a troll wanting to
proselytize his opinion.
Yes, but you yourself spammed the ng by reposting the link he provided.
Try not to do that again. Thanks.
All I can say is, at least the group is awake and active. Can't care
less how one replies to a troll.
Bizarro Roy
2021-07-09 14:59:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Frank
Post by Bizarro Roy
Post by VanguardLH
Post by Bob
Texas Congressman and former White House doctor Ronny Jackson warned this
week that the U.S. is going to ¥pay a price° for having a president that is
clearly not able to execute his duties
because of cognitive decline.
Appearing on Hannity, Jackson noted that ¥Our adversaries are taking
advantage of us,° and Biden should be made to take a cognitive test, just
as President Trump was.
<snip>
Post by VanguardLH
Post by Bob
*********** This space reserved for poster_4's Sandy Hook rant **************
Off-topic, policitical flaming, so spam from a troll wanting to
proselytize his opinion.
Yes, but you yourself spammed the ng by reposting the link he provided.
Try not to do that again. Thanks.
All I can say is, at least the group is awake and active.
For various definitions of awake and active, okay. Brain-dead
off-topic posts would not seem to meet that definition.
Post by Frank
Can't care less how one replies to a troll.
Perhaps one shouldn't perpetuate trolling by reposting links provided
by a troll.
Frank
2021-07-09 16:02:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bizarro Roy
Post by Frank
Post by Bizarro Roy
Post by VanguardLH
Post by Bob
Texas Congressman and former White House doctor Ronny Jackson warned this
week that the U.S. is going to ¥pay a price° for having a president that is
clearly not able to execute his duties
because of cognitive decline.
Appearing on Hannity, Jackson noted that ¥Our adversaries are taking
advantage of us,° and Biden should be made to take a cognitive test, just
as President Trump was.
<snip>
Post by VanguardLH
Post by Bob
*********** This space reserved for poster_4's Sandy Hook rant **************
Off-topic, policitical flaming, so spam from a troll wanting to
proselytize his opinion.
Yes, but you yourself spammed the ng by reposting the link he provided.
Try not to do that again. Thanks.
All I can say is, at least the group is awake and active.
For various definitions of awake and active, okay. Brain-dead
off-topic posts would not seem to meet that definition.
Post by Frank
Can't care less how one replies to a troll.
Perhaps one shouldn't perpetuate trolling by reposting links provided
by a troll.
That is true and I have been guilty myself. Best not to respond to them
at all.
VanguardLH
2021-07-10 02:42:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bizarro Roy
Post by VanguardLH
Post by Bob
Texas Congressman and former White House doctor Ronny Jackson warned this
week that the U.S. is going to ¥pay a price° for having a president that is
clearly not able to execute his duties
because of cognitive decline.
Appearing on Hannity, Jackson noted that ¥Our adversaries are taking
advantage of us,° and Biden should be made to take a cognitive test, just
as President Trump was.
<snip>
Post by VanguardLH
Post by Bob
*********** This space reserved for poster_4's Sandy Hook rant **************
Off-topic, policitical flaming, so spam from a troll wanting to
proselytize his opinion.
Yes, but you yourself spammed the ng by reposting the link he provided.
Try not to do that again. Thanks.
Yep, I forgot to munge the URL, like:

https :// www . infowars . c*m/posts/video-former-white-house-doctor-warns-u-s-will-pay-a-price-for-electing-cognitively-declining-biden/

which would allow someone else to reconstruct the URL should they decide
to visit it. I don't censor the URLs or words from the view of
children, but I usually make it non-clickable. Forgot this time.
Loading...